Legal Opinion

Herbert And Barbara Heintz, Appellant's v. Jp Morgan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 16, 2014No. 70628-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON HERBERT HEINTZ and BARBARA No. 70628-4-1 HEINTZ, husband and wife, DIVISION ONE Appellants, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, UNPUBLISHED NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE FILED: June 16, 2014 CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, trustee, Respondents. Cox, J. — After defaulting on a promissory note secured by a deed of trust, the borrower filed suit claiming the lender increased the monthly payment in violation of terms of the note and the successor trustee under the deed of trust lacked authority to schedule a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. Because no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Albice v. Premier Mortgage Services of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API