Legal Opinion

Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co. of North America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 16, 1930No. 4326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns a glass which is nonshatterable, in that, while it may be broken, the broken pieces stay in place and will not splinter. It is largely used in automobiles, and since, as stated by the court below, 60 per cent, of automobile personal injuries are caused by flying splinters, not only its commercial value will be seen, but if protected by a patent, such patent partakes of the humane. See J. L. Mott Iron Works v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 159 F. 135, 138, where this court in an analogous situation said: “He contributed to an important…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. L. Mott Iron Works v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Steinfur Patents Corporation v. William Beyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  4. Triplex Safety Glass Co. of North America v. KolbDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Pennsylvania Research Corp. v. Lescarboura Spawn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API