Legal Opinion

J. L. Mott Iron Works v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 6, 1908No. 53PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below the Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Company, owner of patent No. 633,941, granted September 26, 1899, to James W. Arrott, Jr., for a dredger for pulverulent material, brought suit against the J. U. Mott Iron Works for the infringement thereof. That court adjudged the patent valid and its three claims infringed; From such decree the latter appealed.

The process involved is the enameling of bath tubs and like wares, which consists in evenly distributing powered glass through a sieve on cast-iron tubs raised to a high heat. This sprinkling process is…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  2. Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Exeter Mach. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  3. Lenk v. Hunt-Lasher Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1926
  4. Wayman v. Louis Lipp Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1912
  5. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. Iron City Sanitary Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API