Legal Opinion
People v. Alvarez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 18, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, based on the facts and admissions contained in the pre-sentence investigation report, the case summary, and the risk assessment instrument of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Yarborough, 43 AD3d 1129, 1130 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 816 [2007]; People v Penson, 38 AD3d 866, 867 [2007]; People v Romana, 35 AD3d 1241 [2006]; People v Carlton, 307 AD2d 763, 764 [2003]). Spolzino,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CarltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. PensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. YarboroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. RomanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. DeturrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. Garcia (Fernando)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008