Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1961No. 9270PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Ray Tanner appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative, and George and Charles Rudd. The summary judgment was granted on the theory that Tanner had signed a release dated October 7, 1952, which discharged defendants from all prior claims of Tanner. This release contains the following:

“Release
“In consideration of the payment of $9,350.06 from the Utah Poultry and Farmers Cooperative (being the balance owed to me under the marketing of my 1951 crop of turkeys) receipt of which is acknowledged, I do hereby release…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. R. J. Daum Const. Co. v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Continental Bank and Trust Company v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bullock v. Deseret Dodge Truck Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Company v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Abdulkadir v. Western Pacific Railroad CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Frank v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Holbrook Company v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dillman v. Massey Ferguson, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1962
  4. FMA Acceptance Co. v. Leatherby Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Frederick May & Company v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API