Legal Opinion
Fegles Const. Co., Limited v. McLaughlin Const. Co
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1953No. 13231PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYRNE, District Judge.
All of the parties are contractors who were engaged in construction work at Fort Peck Powerhouse on July 16, 1947, when a fire occurred which resulted in damage to property of appellee McLaughlin.
McLaughlin was building an addition to the powerhouse under a contract with the United States Government. Appellant Feg-les was performing certain construction work under a contract with the United States Government, which included the installation of three surge tanks on top of the powerhouse. The installation of the surge tanks had been sublet by Fegles to appellant Chicago…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Soreide v. Vilas & CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- State v. BuchananNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Charles E. Toliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Western Stock Center, Inc. v. Sevit, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.