Legal Opinion

Manchester Housing Authority v. Belcourt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 1971No. 6207. No. 6208PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lamerón, J.

The sole issues presented on these consolidated appeals are whether in a proceeding for eminent domain under RSA 203:12, 12-a a defendant is entitled to recover attorney’s fees and an appraisal fee incurred in the course thereof.

The plaintiff authority acquired the properties of the respective defendants by virtue of the powers granted to it by RSA 203:12 and RSA 205:3. The former section provides that if the superior court, upon a petition by the authority and after notice given, finds that the public interest will be prejudiced by delay, it may order that the authority be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Benda v. FanaOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Leadville Water Co. v. Parkville Water DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. State v. Everett HolderIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Calhoun v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API