Legal Opinion

Webb v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Webb

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2005No. S-11160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Gary Webb, a father of two children, did not pay child support during a period when his children were in the custody of their grandmothers. He claims that the children's mother, to whom he owed the support payments, is precluded under Civil Rule from collecting the arrears accumulated during that time. The superior court disagreed with Webb, concluding that Rule 90.3(h)(3) provides for preclusion only when the obligor parent has primary physical custody of the children. We agree with the superior court and affirm. |

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Factual History

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vachon v. PuglieseAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matthews v. MatthewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Turinsky v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Fernandez v. FernandezAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Mary Aparezuk v. Jeremy SchlosserAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API