California Savings & Commercial Bank v. Wheeler
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
A rehearing was granted in this case in order to give further consideration to the contention of appellant that the alteration in the mortgage was made by the husband of defendant Wheeler as her lawful agent. Upon such further consideration, we are of the opinion that such was not the fact. For that reason, and for the other reasons hereinafter expressed, we adopt our former opinion, with additional comment, viz.:
“Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Wheeler in an action brought by plaintiff to foreclose a mortgage.
“The original complaint named Harriette E. Wheeler as sole…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Langenberger v. KrœgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Lasky v. BewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Commercial & Savings Bank of Stockton v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Dozier v. National Borax Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Olson v. Six Rivers National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- O'Banion v. ParadisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Angus v. LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Voge, Inc. v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.