Legal Opinion

Roger Demasse Maria A. Garcia Billy W. Jones Viola Munguia Greg Palmer Socorro Soza v. Itt Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Dba Itt Cannon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1997No. 96-15520PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

Former employees of ITT Corporation appeal from summary judgment on their claim that ITT breached an implied-in-fact promise to conduct layoffs according to the seniority provisions of superseded employee handbooks, rather than the “merits” policy contained in a new handbook issued shortly before they were laid off. The district court assumed that the old handbooks were part of the employees’ contracts because they did not clearly disclaim contractual intent, but held in a published opinion that the seniority provisions of those handbooks could be changed by ITT and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Leikvold v. Valley View Community HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wagner v. City of GlobeArizona Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Demasse v. ITT Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Demasse v. ITT Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Demasse v. ITT Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Vedachalam v. Tata America International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Vedachalam v. Tata America International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API