Legal Opinion

Wagner v. City of Globe

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1986No. 18564-PRPublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice.

We granted this Petition for Review to determine whether summary judgment was properly entered against the petitioner in light of allegations that his at-will employment was terminated in breach of implied contract and in violation of public policy.

The court of appeals affirmed the entry of summary judgment by memorandum decision. Wagner et ux v. City of Globe, 2 CA-CIV 5361 (filed Oct. 11, 1985). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6 § 5(3) and Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ. App.P., 17A A.R.S.

As a preliminary matter, we note that summary judgment is improper…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Winters v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Guy v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Federal Election Commission v. NRA Political Victory FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API