Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Demasse v. ITT Corp.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1999No. CV-97-0177-CQPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JONES, Vice Chief Justice,

concurring in part and dissenting in part:

¶ 52 I concur in the majority’s response to certified question No. 2. I also concur in that section of the majority opinion titled “Justice Martone’s Dissent,” dealing with a procedural matter wholly unrelated to the substantive issues in this case.

¶ 53 I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority opinion responding to certified question No. 1. The response undermines legitimate employer expectations in a remarkable departure from traditional at-will employment principles. It transforms the conventional…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API