Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Hubert
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo; Knappen, J. Assumpsit by the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, a foreign corporation, against Louis M. Hubert, Charles S. Kressler, and Herbert E. Congdon, copartners as the Celery City Electric Company, for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant Congdon and in favor of plaintiffs as to other defendants. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Early in the year 1909 Louis M. Hubert and Charles S. Kressler formed a copartnership under the name and style of the Celery City Electric Company, to carry on the business of selling electrical supplies and doing a general electrical business in the city of Kalamazoo. W. H. Beattys was a traveling salesman for the plaintiff, and the testimony of de fendant Kressler shows that, during the early part of 1909, Beattys called upon the firm, but they gave him no orders at that time. In February, 1909, plaintiff wrote defendant Herbert E. Congdon, making inquiry as to the financial responsibility…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bush & Hattaway v. McCarty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Cox v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Jenkins Bros. Shoe Co. v. G. v. Renfrow & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Goodspeed v. Wiard Plow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Neal v. M. E. Smith & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peters v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- B. T. Moran, Inc. v. First Security Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
- Hurst Boillin Co. v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Night Commander Lighting Co. v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- J. B. Colt Co. v. ElamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.