Legal Opinion
Taneff v. Lipka
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 2019No. 18AP-291PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Marilyn A. Cramer and Carrie A. Chaplin ("appellants"), appeal from the March 22, 2018 judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, approving attorney fees for the work of plaintiff-appellee, Thomas Taneff ("appellee"), as successor ancillary administrator in a R.C. Chapter 2129 land sale action and imposing attorney fees and costs as sanctions for Ms. Cramer's willful violations of Civ.R. 11 and R.C. 2323.51. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
{¶ 2} Selena Cramer ("decedent") died on September…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Newman v. Al Castrucci Ford Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. SalahuddinOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Grandview Hts. v. B.S.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- White v. Cent. Ohio Gaming Ventures, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re A.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Cramer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.