Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 93-7PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

R.C. 2929.05(A) mandates that we undertake a three-prong analysis. First, we must consider the specific issues raised by the appellant with regard to the proceedings below. Second, we must independently weigh the *157aggravating circumstances in this case against any factors that mitigate the penalty. Third, we must independently consider whether appellant’s sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in other similar cases.

For the reasons that follow, we uphold appellant’s conviction and affirm the sentence of death.

I

Propositions of Law I, II, and IV relate to joinder of the separate…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BallewOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API