State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
R.C. 2929.05(A) mandates that we undertake a three-prong analysis. First, we must consider the specific issues raised by the appellant with regard to the proceedings below. Second, we must independently weigh the *157aggravating circumstances in this case against any factors that mitigate the penalty. Third, we must independently consider whether appellant’s sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in other similar cases.
For the reasons that follow, we uphold appellant’s conviction and affirm the sentence of death.
I
Propositions of Law I, II, and IV relate to joinder of the separate…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BallewOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.