Legal Opinion

Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 27, 1992No. 23646PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

This is a suit for refund of documentary stamp taxes paid under protest. Appellant Loyola Federal Savings and Loan Association (Loyola) asserts that the master-in-equity committed various errors. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTS

Loyola commenced an action in 1988 to foreclose loans secured by a condominium hotel in Myrtle Beach. The master-in-equity issued a decree of foreclosure in November 1989 and ordered the condominium hotel sold at public auction. Loyola was the successful bidder, and the master-in-equity consequently issued a master’s deed conveying…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smalls v. WeedCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. PinckneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. Investors Premium Corp. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tucker v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. CharpingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API