State v. Charping
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGoolsby, Acting Associate Justice
I concur in the majority’s affirmance of James Michael Charping’s convictions and sentences for kidnapping, criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, and criminal conspiracy. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reversal of Charping’s conviction for capital murder and of his death sentence. I do not think the mere failure of the record to reflect a waiver by Charping of his statutory right to make a personal, closing jury argument during the guilt-determination phase of his trial for capital murder and other offenses warrants a reversal of his murder conviction and death sentence. It…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.