Wadzinski v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 41. {dissenting). The issue in this case is whether the umbrella insurance policy provides uninsured motorist (UM) coverage. The parties' arguments center on the meaning of an endorsement, which provides in full:
Exclusion of Personal Injury to Insureds Following Form
We do not cover personal injury to you or a relative. We will cover such injury to the extent that insurance is provided by an underlying policy listed in Schedule A.
¶ 42. Both parties agree that the first sentence, standing alone, would operate to exclude UM coverage.1 However, the first sentence does not stand alone, and *338the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of Bradley v. Royal Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. London MarketWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BaileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Muehlenbein v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.