Legal Opinion

Estate of Bradley v. Royal Surplus Lines Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2011No. 10-60650PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

In this insurance coverage dispute, the Estate of Mable Dean Bradley (“the Estate”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Defendants-Appellees Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Co. (“Royal”) and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. (“Lumbermens”). 1 The district court found that, as a matter of law, Royal and Lumbermens were not required to defend or indemnify a policyholder/defendant in a separate lawsuit brought by the Estate in a Mississippi state court. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.

I

Mable Dean Bradley was a resident at the Indianola…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Valle v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. Canal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. Myron Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Company and Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Teresa Patrick v. Wal-Mart, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Philip Cannata v. Catholic Diocese of Austin, et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Willie Harried, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Logisticare Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. Shirley Cotton v. GGNSC Batesville, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API