Estate of Bradley v. Royal Surplus Lines Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
In this insurance coverage dispute, the Estate of Mable Dean Bradley (“the Estate”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Defendants-Appellees Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Co. (“Royal”) and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. (“Lumbermens”). 1 The district court found that, as a matter of law, Royal and Lumbermens were not required to defend or indemnify a policyholder/defendant in a separate lawsuit brought by the Estate in a Mississippi state court. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.
I
Mable Dean Bradley was a resident at the Indianola…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Valle v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. Canal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Myron Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Company and Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Teresa Patrick v. Wal-Mart, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Philip Cannata v. Catholic Diocese of Austin, et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Willie Harried, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Logisticare Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Shirley Cotton v. GGNSC Batesville, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.