Legal Opinion
Johnson Controls, Inc. v. London Market
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2010No. 2007AP1868PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals1 pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61 (2007-08).2 We are asked to determine whether London Market had a duty to defend Johnson Controls. If it did, we then must determine when, if at all, that duty was triggered.
¶ 2. London Market contends that it had no duty to defend Johnson Controls because its insurance policy *183is an indemnity-only excess umbrella policy that does not promise a defense. Further, it asserts that the duty to defend set forth in the underlying Travelers insurance policies is not incorporated into…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Edgerton v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Olson v. FarrarWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Wadzinski v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Day v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Maxwell v. Hartford Union High School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. DowdyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.