Legal Opinion

United States v. Pete Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1979No. 77-5536PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

Acting jointly with a confederate, the defendant Pete Hernandez, sold heroin on a single occasion to two undercover agents. The defendant was never shown to have had actual possession of the controlled substance but constructive control during the course of the transaction was proved by the acts of his co-defendant. He was convicted both of possession with intent to distribute and distribution of heroin in violation of the same statute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We here review the validity of the imposition on him of consecutive sentences of imprisonment for ten…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul SantoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Ronald Berkowitz, Paul D'alessandro, Kevin Van Coughnett, Bisan Vafaie, and Wendall HowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API