Greenwich v. Markhoff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about September 25, 1995, which granted defendants’ motions *113to dismiss the complaint for legal malpractice for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating the second cause of action asserting a claim for legal malpractice as against defendants Scheine, Fusco, Brandenstein and Rada and Scheine, Fusco, Branden-stein & Rada, P. C., and except as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
The amended verified complaint alleges that plaintiff sustained injury on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mendoza v. SchlossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Davis v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lauer v. RappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Brainard v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wall Street Associates v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ruffolo v. GarbariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Somma v. Dansker & Aspromonte AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Golden v. CascioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Block v. Brecher, Fishman, Feit, Heller, Rubin & TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.