Legal Opinion
Davis v. Klein
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1996PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff Robert Davis retained the defendant law firm in March 1987 to represent and appear for him in all proceedings concerning a workers’ compensation claim arising out of an accident which occurred on property allegedly owned by the City of New York. In 1988, plaintiff’s case was allegedly referred by the defendant attorney to another lawyer in the same firm for discussion on commencing a third-party action against the City. Plaintiff was informed at that time that his claim against the City…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Carmel v. LunneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- NA KERSON CO., INC. v. ShayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- N. A. Kerson Co. v. Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by46 opinions
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk & WardwellNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Barnett v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Burnell G. Carney and Alice Carney, by L. David Zube, Chapter 11 Trustee v. James v. PhilipponeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Small Business Bodyguard Inc. v. House of Moxie, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.