Legal Opinion
Gann v. Morris
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 29, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3049PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Chief Judge.
Following a court trial, the buyers of a silk screening business were awarded damages for the seller’s breach of a covenant not to compete. On the seller’s appeal we must determine whether the trial court was correct in upholding the covenant and computing damages as it did. We find no error and affirm.
We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the judgment. Polk v. Koerner, 111 Ariz. 493, 533 P.2d 660 (1975). On April 11, 1974, Gerry Morris entered into an agreement to sell his “silk screening business or lettering shop” to Alfred and Connie Gann.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Polk v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Taylor Freezer Sales Co. v. Sweden Freezer Eastern Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Canyon Television & Appliance Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Mammo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. DanielsArizona Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.