Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Henry

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 1, 1995No. 93-1283; CMR No. 92 0042PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

1. In the issues we granted for review (39 MJ 416), appellant contends that he was selectively prosecuted because of his race (Issue V) and that the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review1 abused its discretion in affirming a sentence that was disproportionate to those of his co-conspirators (Issue I).2 We further specified an issue concerning whether appellant was provided conflict-free counsel.

2. Appellant, Private E-l, USMC, pleaded guilty, in Okinawa, Japan, to committing multitudinous offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. LacyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. CombsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API