Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 26, 1945No. 554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAVY, District Judge.

This is an action by the United States on behalf of the Quillehüte Tribe of Indians, wherein the United States seeks to *662enjoin Milo Moore, Director of Fisheries of the State of Washington, and John Biggs, Acting Director of Game of the State of Washington, from in any manner interfering with the Quillehute Indians in their use of the waters of the Quillehute River and the tide lands of the Pacific Ocean, where the River and ocean border on the reservation, and, further, to enjoin them from exercising jurisdiction in the region just described.

It is admitted that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SchmuckWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States v. BouchardDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1978
  3. Skokomish Indian Tribe v. E. L. France, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API