Legal Opinion

Skokomish Indian Tribe v. E. L. France, Trustee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1963No. 17933_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMESON, District Judge.

Appellant, an Indian tribe ineorpo-rated under an Act of Congress, 1 brought this action to establish a claim of title to a strip of tidelands adjoining its reservation on the Hood Canal and the Skoko-mish River in western Washington. Appellant’s claim is based upon a treaty between the United States and certain Indian tribes dated January 26, 1855, proelaimed April 29, 1859 (12 Stat. 933), and an executive order dated February 25, 1874. Appellees claim title through various conveyances from the State of Washington. The case was tried before the court without a jury. ^…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Choctaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  3. United States v. City of Tacoma, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  5. Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API