Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Brooks

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, Yolo County, The opinion of the Court contains the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, C. J.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

The ninth section of the Act to fund the debt of the County of' Yolo, after having provided for funding the indebtedness existing prior to the 1st of January, 1853, and for paying the interest on the same by a special tax levied for that purpose, provides that it shall be the duty of the Treasurer to set aside a Sinking Fund, into which shall be paid “ First—any and all surplus of the interest fund aforesaid; Second —whatever surplus may remain in the treasury of the County of Yolo, on the first day of March, 1854, and on the first day of March every year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mason v. PurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Phillips v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. E. H. Rollins & Sons v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  4. Phillips v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API