Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to First National Bank of Maryland Dated November 4, 1976

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 15, 1977No. Civ. A. M-76-1802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

The First National Bank of Maryland (Bank) moves, pursuant to Rule 17(c), F.R. Crim.P., to quash or modify a grand jury subpoena duces tecum, 1 because the Bank’s compliance with the subpoena would allegedly place an unreasonable burden on the Bank absent reimbursement for its costs in retrieving and reproducing the subpoenaed records.

At issue is the question of whether the Bank or society at large must bear ultimate responsibility for the expense involved in retrieving and reproducing the financial records which The Bank Records and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Winters National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  5. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API