Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Investigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 7, 1978No. Misc. 78-510PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
The petitioner, a corporation whose records have been subpoenaed by the grand jury, requests the aid of this court with respect to two subpoenas duces tecum. 1 Having already complied with the first subpoena, the petitioner seeks an order to compel the government to return the documents submitted to date or to bear the costs of reproducing those documents. In addition, the petitioner moves to quash a second subpoena.
On March 16, 1978, the grand jury issued to the president of the corporate petitioner a subpoena duces tecum commanding the production of 33…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Matter of Grand Jury Applicants, C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc., Joseph J. Reinert, David Verna, David F. Herrala, Paul P. Marchese, Charles P. McDevitt and Joseph H. McDevittCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In re Various Grand Jury SubpoenasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. County Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Tivian Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.