Palmer v. . Jennette
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Among other objections to the trial not necessary to discuss at length, the appellants insist that the judgment is not supported by the verdict, because of alleged irreconcilable repugnances in the answers to the several issues. Specifically it is contended that the fifth issue, permitting recovery and determining the amount thereof, is contrary to the findings under the third and fourth issues sustaining defendants’ allegation that there was in the sales contract an express warranty of merchantability of the produce sold, and that plaintiffs had breached that warranty. Indeed, it is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Jernigan v. . NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Piazza v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- Matter of Will of LeonardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Lee v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Strum v. Greenville Timberline, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.