Commonwealth v. Floyd
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
Appellant Frank Floyd was convicted in a non-jury trial of charges of robbery, burglary, simple assault, conspiracy, and possession of instruments of crime. Following the deni al of post trial motions, sentence was imposed. On this direct appeal, two issues are raised for our determination:
1) whether certain Commonwealth witnesses should have been permitted to testify after a violation of a sequestration order;
2) whether the Commonwealth knowingly presented a witness who perjured himself.
We find no error and will therefore affirm.
Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. GeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LevensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. StinnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HarteySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BoothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. GallowaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.