State v. Hurt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Justice.
This matter is before the Court oh (1) the State’s direct appeal of the decision of the Court of Appeals vacating defendant’s sentence and remanding defendant’s case to the trial court for resentencing, and (2) defendant’s motion for appropriate relief filed in this Court on 25 June 2004, during the pendency of the State’s appeal. Regarding the State’s direct appeal, this Court must determine whether the fact that a criminal “defendant joined with one other person in committing the offense and was not charged with committing a conspiracy for robbery of [the] victim” is a proper…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. LasiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. HurtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. ByersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.