Enriquez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice DORSEY.
A jury convicted appellant, Elíseo Enri-quez, of intoxication manslaughter and intoxication assault. The jury assessed punishment at seventeen and eight years in prison to run concurrently. By two points of error appellant complains of the admission of evidence of his prior drug-related convictions and of his refusal to take a blood test. We hold that evidence of his three prior convictions were admitted in error and were harmful. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
*599I. Analysis
By his first point of error appellant contends that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Russell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- David Andrew Schmidt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
- Allan Cunningham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.