Legal Opinion

JKL Components Corp. v. Insul-Reps, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1992No. 29A02-9111-CV-495PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Defendant-appellant JKL Components Corporation (JKL) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Insul-Reps, Inc. (Insul-Reps), claiming that the trial court should have enforced the parties' agreement to arbitrate, that the trial court erred when it found an implied contract between the parties, and when it calculated Insul-Reps' damage award.

We affirm.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the trial court's judgment reveal that JKL, a California corporation, is a distributor of lamps and lighted products to original equipment manufacturers (such as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Gambar Enterprises, Inc. v. Kelly Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Borah v. McCandlessIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Indiana-American Water Co. v. Town of SeelyvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Safety National Casualty Co. v. Cinergy Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API