Legal Opinion
Kyles v. Paul
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided February 1, 1967No. LR-66-C-149, LR-66-C-150PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
HENLEY, Chief Judge.
These two suits in equity, brought under the provisions of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P.L. 88-352, § 201 et seq., 78 Stat. 243 et seq., 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000a and 2000a-l through 2000a-6, have been consolidated for trial and have been tried to the Court without a jury. Federal jurisdiction is not questioned and is established adequately by reference to section 207 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000a-6
Plaintiffs are Negro citizens of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. The defendants in No. 149, Mr. and Mrs. Euell Paul, Jr., own and operate a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Theodore Cuevas v. Tom Sdrales, Dba the Seventy-Three Inn, Salt Lake City Corporation, and Police Officer Rex LefevreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Dr. Bertrand O. Tyson v. Lt. Clarence J. CazesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Daniel v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Miller v. Amusement Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Nesmith v. Young Men's Christian Association Of RaleighCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Fazzio Real Estate Co., Inc. v. Samuel AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Wright v. Cork ClubDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.