Anderson v. DEPT. OF HUM. SERV. OF STATE
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
RAPP, Vice-Chief Judge.
The first-impression issue presented here is whether, under the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396r-5 (Supp. 1995), Medicaid benefits are available to married couples with some assets but limited income. Trial court plaintiffs, Lawrence Anderson and Sally B. Anderson, appeal the trial court’s sustaining the decision by defen dant Department of Human Services (DHS) denying plaintiffs Medicaid assistance. 1
I. BACKGROUND
Medicaid is a cooperative federal-state endeavor designed to provide health care to needy individuals. If a state chooses to participate,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Darnell v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Matter of Estate of CrowlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Blitz U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Seminole Family Medicine Clinic v. SouthernCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.