Legal Opinion

United States v. David Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1990No. 90-2509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

David Marshall appeals from his conviction of conspiracy to commit access device fraud and bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. A jury found Marshall guilty of one count of conspiring with three others to use stolen credit cards to obtain cash advances and services. Marshall claims that the evidence presented against him at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury’s verdict.

In reviewing a jury conviction, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 469,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. David Big Crow, United States of America v. David Big CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Duane Francis SnellingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Mareno M. WalokeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Darrell J. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Russell J. FrauendorferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Rushel Mack CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Russell FrauendorferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API