Legal Opinion

United States v. Rushel Mack Carlisle

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1991No. 90-2465SIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Rushel Mack Carlisle appeals his convictions for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine, use of a person under 18 years of age in a drug conspiracy, use of a firearm in a drug trafficking crime, and possession of a firearm by a felon. Carlisle also contends the district court committed error in refusing to grant a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Carlisle argues the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdicts. We must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and affirm if substantial evidence in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Antonio Nonato EvidenteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Roger JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Joseph DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Andrew James DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. David MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Rickie Lee HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Tony Lavon CarlinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Roger James HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API