Bystrom Ex Rel. Bystrom v. Fridley High School
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ALSOP, Chief Judge.
This matter came before the court on May 8, 1987, upon defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the court makes the following statement of:
UNDISPUTED FACTS
In January 1985 a group of students at Fridley High School, including one of the plaintiffs in this action, distributed on the high school premises an unofficial newspaper, entitled Tour de Farce, which they had written. The day after the students distributed this newspaper, officials of Fridley High School summoned the students to a conference…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Porter v. Ascension Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Byrd v. Irmo High SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Dean Poling v. Ellis MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Killion v. Franklin Regional School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.