Legal Opinion
Killion v. Franklin Regional School District
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-731PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZIEGLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs, Zachariah Paul (a minor) and Joanne Killion (Paul’s parent and natural guardian), commenced this Section 1983 civil action alleging violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and due process violations. For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motion for “partial summary judgment” will be granted, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied.
I. FACTS
The facts are not in dispute and can be…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Porter v. Ascension Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- JS Ex Rel. Snyder v. Blue Mountain School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Chambers v. North Rockland Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Layshock Ex Rel. Layshock v. Hermitage School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.