Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. South Coast Regional Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1977No. Civ. 47682PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, J.
Petitioners Marvena Kennedy, Richard Davidson, Robert Wells and Ron Guenther (hereinafter petitioners) appeal from the judgment of the superior court denying their petition for writ of mandate. The petition challenged the validity of a permit issued by respondent the South Coast Regional Coastal Zone Conservation Commission of Los Angeles and Orange Counties (hereinafter Regional Commission) authorizing respondent Michael Epstein, et al. (hereinafter Epstein) to proceed with a development of property in the Venice area of the City of Los Angeles within the “Coastal Zone”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Environmental Defense Project v. County of SierraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Catalina Investments, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Silver v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Dominey v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.