Legal Opinion
Coggeshall v. Reproductive Endocrine Associates
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 20, 2007No. 26410PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
Appellants (“the Coggeshalls”), residents of Richland County, commenced this action for damages resulting from medical care provided by respondent (REACH), a fertility clinic located in Charlotte, North Carolina. The trial judge dismissed the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2), SCRCP. We affirm.
FACTS
As alleged in their complaint, in November 2000 the Coggeshalls consulted respondent Dr. Crain at REACH regarding in vitro fertilization (IVF). In preparation for IVF, Dr. Crain referred Susan Coggeshall to respondent Dr. Moore in Columbia for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McBee v. Delica Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mendel v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hidria, USA, Inc. v. DeloCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Sullivan v. HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORP.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Graham Law Firm, P.A. v. MakawiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Cribb v. SPATHOLTCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.