Legal Opinion

Graham Law Firm, P.A. v. Makawi

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 17, 2012No. 27086PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

Appellant, Graham Law Firm (Graham), appeals the trial court’s order granting respondents’ motion to set aside default judgment on the grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction based upon inadequate service of process. Because we find that appellant was not given sufficient opportunity for discovery and cross-examination of witnesses on the matter of authorization to accept service of process, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS

In 2007 Graham filed suit against Respondents MKKM, Inc., and Mohamed Makawi, individually and doing business as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Glover v. Columbia Hospital of Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Brown v. South Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Custom Polymers PET, LLC v. Gamma Meccanica SpADistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  2. Christian v. HealyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
  3. Ex Parte: Trustgard Insurance Company v. Full Logistics, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
  4. Miller v. Shellpoint Mortgage ServicingDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023
  5. Owners Insurance Company v. Foxfield Commons POA IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API