Brower v. Campbell Soup Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1)GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 17);(2)DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 18);(3)DENYING CROSS-MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 20)
Hon. Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Harold Brower and Melinda Ferguson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that Defendant Campbell Soup Company’s (“Defendant” or “Campbell Soup") Chunky Healthy Request Grilled Chicken & Sausage Gumbo is falsely and misleadingly labeled and advertised as healthy when, in fact, it contains artificial trans fat, a substance harmful to human health. (Am. Compl., ECF No. 16). Now before the Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- La Vigne v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Organic Consumers Ass'n v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Thornton v. Tyson FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Leining v. Foster Poultry FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Leining v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.