Legal Opinion

Fiore v. City of Highland Park

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 1968No. Gen. 67-130PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

After giving due consideration to the peripheral contentions advanced by the appellant City, we are of the opinion that the issue on this appeal is whether the decree below conforms to the mandate of this court in Fiore v. City of Highland Park, 76 Ill App2d 62, 221 NE2d 323 (1966).

In that case the plaintiffs’ basic contention was that their property was rendered virtually useless by the G-l zoning, herein called O & R (Office and Research), and that such zoning ordinance bore no substantial relationship to the public welfare. The restrictive effect of defendant’s O & R zoning restrictions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Smith v. McIverSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Agran v. Checker Taxi Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pecora v. SzaboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Spears v. SpearsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Wells v. MinorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Whitley v. Lutheran HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API