Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Bridgeport Brass Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided January 25, 1993No. IP 92-26-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McKINNEY, District Judge.

Defendant Bridgeport Brass Corporation, d/b/a Olin Brass, Indianapolis, has moved for summary judgment in this action brought by Duane L. Lloyd, Sr. pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”). For the reasons set forth, the motion is GRANTED.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Background

Bridgeport Brass Corporation (“Bridgeport”) is the largest integrated producer of brass mill products in the United States. It produces brass sheet, rod, tube, and wire, principally for use in the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sink v. Knox County HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  2. Motley v. Tractor Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
  3. Dickson v. AaronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Davis v. Palmer Dodge West, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
  5. Lutheran General Hospital v. Wendy's International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API