Daniel H. SAHADI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS CHEMICAL, Division of Hoover Ball and Bearing Company, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Daniel H. Sahadi brought suit against his employer, Reynolds Chemical, in the district court under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., alleging that he was discriminatorily terminated from employment because of his age. The case went before a jury, but after presentation of the plaintiff’s proofs, the trial judge directed a verdict for Reynolds, holding that, as a matter of law, Sahadi had failed to make out a prima facie case under the Act. We affirm.
The evidence presented at trial, construed most favorably to the plaintiff, fully supports the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Marshall v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Price v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Marshall v. Hills Bros.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
3Cited by121 opinions
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Barnes v. GenCorp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Maud Lee THORNBROUGH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLUMBUS AND GREENVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- William Grosjean v. First Energy Corporation Toledo Edison EnergyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.