Legal Opinion

Daniel H. SAHADI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS CHEMICAL, Division of Hoover Ball and Bearing Company, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1980No. 78-1445PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Per curiam

Daniel H. Sahadi brought suit against his employer, Reynolds Chemical, in the district court under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., alleging that he was discriminatorily terminated from employment because of his age. The case went before a jury, but after presentation of the plaintiff’s proofs, the trial judge directed a verdict for Reynolds, holding that, as a matter of law, Sahadi had failed to make out a prima facie case under the Act. We affirm.

The evidence presented at trial, construed most favorably to the plaintiff, fully supports the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Marshall v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Price v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Marshall v. Hills Bros.District Court, N.D. California · 1977

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Barnes v. GenCorp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Maud Lee THORNBROUGH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLUMBUS AND GREENVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. William Grosjean v. First Energy Corporation Toledo Edison EnergyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API