Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 22, 2011No. 1-09-2546 WCPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman
Presiding Justice McCullough and Justices Hudson and Stewart concurred in the judgment and opinion.
Justice Holdridge specially concurred, with opinion.
OPINION
The claimant, Ruth Lindquist, appeals from an order of the circuit court finding that the injuries which she sustained on November 9, 2005, did not arise out of her employment with the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (the District), and reversing the decision of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) awarding her benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adcock v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Brais v. The Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Bolingbrook Police Department v. Illinois Workers' Compenstion Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Mytnik v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- McAllister v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.