Legal Opinion
United States v. Phillip Warren Jones
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 29, 1988No. 87-8604PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Phillip Warren Jones appeals from the district court’s denial of his post-appeal Rule 35 motion, which alleged that his sentencing failed to comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D). We find no Rule 32 errors in Jones’ sentencing and affirm the district court order.
In 1985 a jury found Jones guilty of one count of conspiracy to possess cocaine under 21 U.S.C. sec. 846 and of two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C. sec. 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Jones to fifteen years’ imprisonment and a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Carlos Bienuenido Cruz, Roberto Cruz, Stephen Cruz, Teresa Irwin, Phillip Warren Jones, Dave Thomas, and Arthur Liggins StrongCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. John RuppelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Richard Bruce CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ronald M. Funt, Randy Webman, Thomas John HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Victor Johnson, Michael Joiner, and Melvin BufordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Louis G. Reese, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. SavelyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.